Upload and Search Files

application/pdf2026-06-10 Artificial Intelligence Res_2026-10.pdf

This is a copy of a resolution about the dangers of AI enacted by Bloomington's city council on June 10, 2026.

application/pdf2026-10-09 Bloomington Police news release Shooting Investigation 1000 N Illinois St 10.9.2026.pdf

This is a news release from Bloomington's police department about an investigation into a shooting on Oct. 8, 2026.

application/pdf2026-01-30 Pittman Stinesville PoliceDeptIN_TFM_MOA_02102026 (3).pdf

This is a copy of a 287(g) agreement between Stinesville and ICE signed by then deputy police chief Shane Pittman on Jan. 30, 2026.

application/pdf2026-10-06 Rokita to Stinesville 2026.10.6 - Letter to Stinesville FINAL.pdf

This is a copy of a letter sent to the Stinesville town board by Indiana attorney general Todd Rokita on the question of whether the town board needs to authorize the signing of a 287(g) agreements with ICE.

application/pdf2026-10-07 Addendum 1 City_Council-20261007-Packet..pdf

This is Addendum 1 to the meeting information packet for the Bloomington city council's meeting on Oct. 7, 2026.

application/pdf2026-10-07 Original Packet City_Council-20261007-Packet.pdf

This is the meeting information packet for the Bloomington city council's meeting on Oct. 7, 2026.

application/pdf2026-10-05 stormwater swale Habitat and CBU Settlement Agreement_20261005.pdf

This is a copy of a settlement agreement between Habitat for Humanity and CBU about a stormwater swale and water hookups in Osage Place, approved by the utilities service board at its Oct. 5, 2026 meeting.

application/pdf2026-09-17 Monroe County commissioners signed Resolution 2026-36_ Stinesville Task Force.pdf

This is a copy of the signed version of a resolution that was approved by Monroe County commissioners critical of the Stinesville contract with ICE.

application/pdf2026-10-05 Bloomington RDC meetingResolution 26-68 - Attachment 1 - Request for Proposals RFP Architectural and Engineering Services - BPD Project.pdf

This is a copy of an RFP for the design of a police HQ building at 714 S. Rogers, which was considered at the Oct. 5, 2026 meeting of Bloomington's redevelopment commission. It was modified to eliminate timeline points for the RDC to make a selection after the Nov. 6, 2026 submission deadline.

application/pdf2026-09-15 1-26-cv-01460 ACLU witness list 073112023124.pdf

This is one of the witness lists for the ACLU lawsuit filed against the Monroe County government over conditions at the jail.

application/pdf2026-09-15 1-26-cv-01460 Commissioners Witness List 073112023601.pdf

This is one of the witness lists for the ACLU lawsuit filed against the Monroe County government over conditions at the jail.

application/pdf2026-09-21 1-26-cv-01460 County Council Wintness List 073112036302.pdf

This is one of the witness lists for the ACLU lawsuit filed against the Monroe County government over conditions at the jail.

application/pdf2026-09-29 1-26-cv-02529 cesar gomez judgment on habeous corpus.pdf

application/pdf2026-09-11 show cause order cesar augusto cepeda gomez 1-26-cv-02529.pdf

This is a copy of the show cause order issued on Sept. 11, 2026 in connection with the case of Cesar Augusto Cepeda Gomez, for federal cause number 1:26-cv-02529

application/pdf2026-09-30 1-26-cv-02694 order to show cause MANUEL ALEJANDRO NADAL ORTIZ 09918022250.pdf

This is a show cause order issued on Sept. 30, 2026 in the case of MANUEL ALEJANDRO NADAL ORTIZ.

application/pdf2026-09-29 1-26-cv-02529 cesar gomez Opinion habeuous corpus 09918019802.pdf

This is a copy of the Sept. 29, 2026 opinion issued by an immigration judge in the case of Cesar Gomez, ordering that he either be released or given a bond hearing.

application/pdf1225b2A versus 1226a 2026-07-24 26-104 Supreme Court cert petition 2nd Circuit Rhoney v Barbosa da Cunha.pdf.pdf

This is a copy of the petition filed with the US Supreme Court on appeal from the 2nd Circuit court of appeals on the question of 1225b2A versus 1226a immigration proceedings.

application/pdf1225b2A versus 1226a 2026-02-06 25-20496 5th Circuit admission 25-20496-CV0.pdf

This is one of 11 decisions rendered by courts of appeals in the 11 districts across the US on the question of whether whether noncitizens who entered the United States without being formally admitted and were later arrested in the interior must be detained without bond under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A), or instead are detained under § 1226(a), which allows for an individualized bond hearing.

application/pdf1225b2A versus 1226a 2026-03-25 25-3248 8th Circuit admission.pdf

This is one of 11 decisions rendered by courts of appeals in the 11 districts across the US on the question of whether whether noncitizens who entered the United States without being formally admitted and were later arrested in the interior must be detained without bond under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A), or instead are detained under § 1226(a), which allows for an individualized bond hearing.

application/pdf1225b2A versus 1226a 2026-04-28 25-3141 2nd Circuit admission.pdf

This is one of 11 decisions rendered by courts of appeals in the 11 districts across the US on the question of whether whether noncitizens who entered the United States without being formally admitted and were later arrested in the interior must be detained without bond under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A), or instead are detained under § 1226(a), which allows for an individualized bond hearing.

application/pdf1225b2A versus 1226a 2026-05-06 25-14065 11th Circuit admission.pdf

This is one of 11 decisions rendered by courts of appeals in the 11 districts across the US on the question of whether whether noncitizens who entered the United States without being formally admitted and were later arrested in the interior must be detained without bond under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A), or instead are detained under § 1226(a), which allows for an individualized bond hearing.

application/pdf1225b2A versus 1226a 2026-05-11 25-1965 et al 6th Circuit admission 26a0139p-06.pdf

This is one of 11 decisions rendered by courts of appeals in the 11 districts across the US on the question of whether whether noncitizens who entered the United States without being formally admitted and were later arrested in the interior must be detained without bond under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A), or instead are detained under § 1226(a), which allows for an individualized bond hearing.

application/pdf1225b2A versus 1226a 2026-06-30 26-6019 10th Circuit admission 010111461009.pdf

This is one of 11 decisions rendered by courts of appeals in the 11 districts across the US on the question of whether whether noncitizens who entered the United States without being formally admitted and were later arrested in the interior must be detained without bond under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A), or instead are detained under § 1226(a), which allows for an individualized bond hearing.

application/octet-stream1225b2A versus 1226a 2026-07-30 25-3127 7th Circuit admission processWebInputExternal.pdf

This is one of 11 decisions rendered by courts of appeals in the 11 districts across the US on the question of whether whether noncitizens who entered the United States without being formally admitted and were later arrested in the interior must be detained without bond under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A), or instead are detained under § 1226(a), which allows for an individualized bond hearing.

application/pdf1225b2A versus 1226a 2026-07-30 25-6842 9th Circuit admission 25-6842.pdf

This is one of 11 decisions rendered by courts of appeals in the 11 districts across the US on the question of whether whether noncitizens who entered the United States without being formally admitted and were later arrested in the interior must be detained without bond under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A), or instead are detained under § 1226(a), which allows for an individualized bond hearing.